17 January 2019
Moscow: 14:12
London: 11:12

Consular queries:  
+44 (0) 203 668 7474  
info@rusemb.org.uk  

 
319 days have passed since the Salisbury incident - no credible information or response from the British authorities                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     311 days have passed since the death of Nikolay Glushkov on British soil - no credible information or response from the British authorities

SPEECHES, INTERVIEWS, ARTICLES

28.11.2018

Statement of the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the OPCW Alexander Shulgin at the Fourth OPCW Review Conference

Distinguished Mr. Chair,

We consider absolutely unacceptable the groundless accusations voiced in the statement of the United States that Russia is in violation of its obligations under Article I of the CWC pertaining to alleged involvement of Russian nationals in use of a nerve agent in Salisbury. Such statements have absolutely no bearing on the facts and are effectively aired to influence the international community. The refusal of the United Kingdom to cooperate in any form with Russia on the “Skripal case”, which would be in accordance with paragraph 2 of Article IX of the CWC only underlines the emptiness of the accusations. Nevertheless, the United Kingdom has addressed the Technical Secretariat with a request to confirm the outcomes of its own national investigation, which contradicts the goals and objectives of technical assistance provided to a State Party under subparagraph e) of paragraph 38 of Article VIII of the CWC. As follows from the presented materials on the assistance provided in connection to Salisbury and Amesbury cases, we have to state the politically motivated nature of the undertaken measures.

On April 18, 2018 at the meeting of the Special Session of the Executive Council Russia announced that the problem of the “Novichok” family is the problem of the Western states. It was in violation of Article I of the CWC that the chemical laboratories of the Western countries researched the structures of over a hundred chemical compounds. Such activities were carried out in the United States, as well as at the Center of Excellence created under the auspices of NATO in Czech Republic. At this center all leading Western countries conducted their research.

The Russian Federation has officially submitted to the OPCW Technical Secretariat a document including about a thousand of new chemical compounds that were proposed to be introduced in the CWC Control Schedules. These proposals include, inter alia, 400 chemical compounds that were developed in the United States, patented as chemical weapons before the signing of the Convention yet not present in the Schedule at the final stage of work on the Convention. That is what constitutes a grave violation of international obligations under the Convention! In light of this, the proposal of the United States, Canada and the Netherlands to include only two compounds in the Schedules of the Convention looks absolutely insufficient as far as undertaking measures for strengthening the Convention.

Mr. Chair,

Recently for some reason the United States has been taking on the role of solemn custodians of the Convention. Pointing out to other States Parties at their alleged transgressions against the Convention. But what of the United States itself? We would like to specifically point out that the observation of its obligations under the Convention by the USA is fraught with cherry-picking. Any provisions of the Conventions that do not coincide with the US interests are effectively ignored by Washington.

As an example, the US Congress has made 28 reservations in the process of ratification of the Convention, that allow to circumvent its provisions.

Specifically: prohibit on export of any chemical samples taken in the United States; limit the inspections in the USA carried out by the OPCW experts pertaining to identifying activities prohibited under the Convention at the request of another State Party; keep in force the Executive Decree no.11850 of April 8, 1975 allowing the use of riot control agents in war, which is also prohibited under Article I of the CWC. The United States is practically the only state keeping a reservation on the Geneva Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare of 1925, that provides for a possibility to use chemical weapons in retaliation.

It is also worth mentioning that in 2003-2011 the US and British specialists found in Iraq over 4.5 thousand of chemical artillery shells, rockets and air bombs and covertly destroyed them without verification by the OPCW Technical Secretariat. The main reason for covering up the situation was the apparent unwillingness to expose the involvement of the United States in the past chemical warfare program of Iraq. Notably after the journalist investigation carried out by the New York Times it was revealed that the CIA had implemented a whole program of buying from the population and individual militants undetected, abandoned and stolen chemical items form the stockpiles of Saddam Hussein

A report on such unusual method of destruction of stockpiles was submitted by the United States to the OPCW only in 2009 to convince the Executive Council of the Organization that the undertaken measures “fully complied with the spirit of the Convention. In turn, the Technical Secretariat then refused to investigate due to alleged “emergency in the situation” and the fact that the CWC lacked the provision on destruction of chemical weapons in combat environment.

Thus the United States and the United Kingdom committed a major violation of the CWC requirements and avoided any assessment of their actions by the international community. The overall volume of detected, destroyed in the field and exported to the USA chemical weapons cannot be properly assessed.

We also question a large number of munitions with allegedly unknown chemicals being destroyed in the United States. We are asked to show trust: apparently those are very old munitions. But we all know that old adage: trust, but verify! It may turn out that under the label of unknown equipment one could hide the traces of undeclared activities in military chemistry.

The United States has likewise not presented all available information on the locations, types, quantities, as well as data on abandonment and state of abandoned chemical weapons.

The United States has not recognized the origin of seven air bombs and one air spray tank with phosgene and cyanogen chloride abandoned by Pentagon in Panama, even though the experts of the OPCW Technical Secretariat as early as 2002 confirmed that they originate from the USA.

A substantial amount of abandoned chemical weapons with CA and CS left by the United States dating back to the Vietnam was found in Cambodia. The OPCW special mission identified that it came from the USA. Yet Washington is silent on that one.

Under the pretext of fighting terrorism in Syria the United States illegally deployed its military contingent. The true reason for American military presence in the region, however, is abetting extremist groups active in Syria to prop up the US political interests. It is those groups that are behind provocations with the use of chemical weapons in Khan Shaykhun and other numerous chemical-related incidents. To create beneficial informational background we see active use of terrorist-affiliated NGOs such as “White Helmets” that have been repeatedly exposed for preparing staged incidents with the use of chemical weapons, for example, in Duma. Time and time again we have informed both the OPCW Executive Council and the UN Security Council on the invalid nature of these allegations. Thus the United States essentially condone chemical terrorism.

It is therefore explicitly evident that the United States accuses Russia and other countries to shift the focus of attention from its own sordid affairs. We call upon the United States to cease and desist from deceiving the international community. Instead the USA should better recognize that it has to take steps to render its activities in conformity with the CWC requirements.

Thank you, Mr. Chair.




LATEST EVENTS

30.10.2018 - Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s interview with ''Moscow. Kremlin. Putin'' TV programme Moscow, October 25, 2018

Question: Why did US National Security Adviser John Bolton come to Moscow? Sergey Lavrov: To talk. There are many matters we need to discuss. We appreciate it that it is US National Security Adviser John Bolton who is especially proactive regarding ties with his colleagues in Moscow. Question: Is this a joke? Sergey Lavrov: Not at all. Actually, we have meetings with Mr Bolton more often than with our other colleagues. He was here in July, and now he is back again. In between, he met with Secretary of Russia’s Security Council Nikolai Patrushev in Geneva. We believe that it is important when such a high-ranking official takes interest in the practical matters on our bilateral agenda.


24.10.2018 - Ambassador Alexander Yakovenko's introductory remarks at the opening of the 2nd Russia-UK Raw Materials Dialogue, 24 October 2018

Ladies and gentlemen, To me as Russian Ambassador to the UK, it is a privilege to address such an important Russian-British conference. The 2nd Russian-UK Raw Materials Dialogue has a great meaning for the professional community in our countries, for it covers a broad range of different topics from mining technologies, new material development and use of natural resources to international academic and scientific exchanges.


27.09.2018 - Remarks by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov at the UN Security Council meeting, September 26, 2018

Mr President, Colleagues, In the modern world, an efficient fight against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction is becoming increasingly important for global and regional stability and the reliable security of all states without exception. Constructive cooperation in this area is an important component of the efforts to shape a positive international agenda. I think everybody agrees that the UN Security Council resolutions that outline specific measures against violations of non-proliferation must be strictly observed. Resolution 1540 remains the basis for this and contains obligations for the member states to take specific measures to prevent non-government agents from accessing weapons of mass destruction and their components. The UNSC decisions taken in pursuance of this resolution are particularly important as they include sanctions for handing over any types of weapons to terrorists. There have been incidents of such handovers and they must be thoroughly investigated.


07.09.2018 - Remarks by Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia, Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the United Nations, following the UNSC meeting on the incident in Salisbury

Q: Do you expect British sanctions on Russia soon? A: We are not expecting or afraid of anything. Taking to the account how things have been developing during the recent years we do not exclude anything. This discussion and yesterday’s speech by the British Prime-Minister in the British Parliament are not coincidental. I think that’s looks like a prelude to a new political season. Q: So, Ambassador it’s really coming from the highest level in the UK. A: It always comes from the highest level. Last time when the incident took place it also came from the highest level. Q: But it seems that you are not taking it seriously. A: We are taking it very seriously. We were saying it all the time. Why we’ve been asking for cooperation with the UK from day one. Only few minutes ago Ambassador Pierce was referring to an ultimatum that Boris Johnson made in his letter to the Russian Ambassador in London when the incident took place presented as a request by the British site to cooperate while in fact it was a demand to to accept the gilt. At the same time our requests which we sent to British authorities constantly through OPCW and bilaterally were ignored.


06.09.2018 - Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s remarks at Bolshaya Igra (Great Game) talk show on Channel One, Moscow, September 4, 2018

Question: Today we have a special guest in our studio, one of the main participants in the “great game”, someone the future of the world really depends on in many ways: Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. We are happy to welcome you in the Great Game studio. Sergey Lavrov: Thanks for inviting me.


22.08.2018 - Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov's comment on UK Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt's anti-Russian claims

At a joint news conference following talks with Foreign Minister of Serbia Ivica Dacic Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov commented on UK Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt's urges to European partners to slap their own sanctions on Russia in connection with the Salisbury incident.


16.08.2018 - Ambassador Alexander Yakovenko's interview for "Salisbury Journal"

The Russian Ambassador said he stands together with the people of Salisbury in a meeting with the Journal last week, as the United States announced new sanctions against the country. Speaking at his official residence in Kensington Palace Gardens on Thursday, Alexander Yakovenko said: “We are together with the people of Salisbury.”


24.06.2018 - Greeting by Ambassador Alexander Yakovenko for the Znaniye school Family Day (Ealing, 24 June 2018)

Dear friends and guests, I am delighted to welcome you at a Family Day celebrating Russia and the World Cup. Today, Russia is the place to be for the whole world. It is a great pleasure to hear fans from all continents appreciating Russia’s hospitality, friendliness and openness to everyone. Right now, people from virtually every country see the 11 host cities, from the Baltic Sea to the Urals on the border of Europe and Asia, and realize how diverse and beautiful our country is. We’d like to bring a bit of Russia and the excitement of the World Cup to Ealing, for those who couldn’t make it to the tournament. By the way, so far both our teams are doing very well, and let us hope they keep up this good work. We cheer for both Russia and England but I’m afraid this can change if both teams meet at the semi-finals.


20.06.2018 - Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s remarks and answers to questions at the Primakov Readings international forum, Moscow, May 30, 2018

Mr Dynkin, Colleagues and friends, Ladies and gentlemen, I am grateful for a new opportunity to speak at the international forum named after Academician Evgeny Primakov, an outstanding Russian statesman, academic and public figure. It is indeed a great honour for me. I consider Mr Primakov, with whom I worked at the Foreign Ministry in the latter half of the 1990s, my senior comrade and teacher, as probably do the majority of those who crossed paths with him at one point. Holding this representative conference under the aegis of one of Russia’s leading academic institutes – National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) that also bears Primakov’s name – has become a good tradition. The Primakov Readings have earned a reputation as a venue for serious dialogue of authoritative specialists on the most pressing issues of international politics and the global economy. Today, there is no lack of buzzwords used by politicians, experts and scientists to capture the current moment in international relations. They talk about the crisis of the “liberal world order” and the advent of the post-Western era, “hot peace” and the “new cold war”. The abundance of terms itself shows that there is probably no common understanding of what is happening. It also points to the fairly dynamic and contradictory state of the system of international relations that is hard to characterise, at least at the present stage, with one resounding phrase. The authors of the overarching theme of the current Primakov Readings probably handled the challenge better than others. In its title “Risks of an unstable world order’ they provocatively, and unacademically, combine the words “unstable” and “order”.


21.04.2018 - Ambassador Alexander Yakovenko's talking points at the Press Conference, 20 April 2018

Since we met last time a lot of events took place: - Military strikes of the United States, UK and France against Syria in violation of the international law - Mission by OPCW inspectors to Douma - Speech of Prime Minister May in Parliament in support of the British aggression against Syria - Special meeting of the OPCW Executive Council (18 April 2018) - New developments in the classified case of Salisbury poisoning of Skripal family - No meaningful developments on the Glushkov case - and Cyber security threats I plan to comment all these issues. And I will be happy to answer all our questions, if you have any.



all messages