23 October 2018
Moscow: 21:31
London: 19:31

Consular queries:  
+44 (0) 203 668 7474  
info@rusemb.org.uk  

 

PRESS RELEASES AND NEWS

17.08.2017

Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s remarks and answers to media questions at a joint press conference following talks with Foreign Minister of Bolivia Fernando Huanacuni Mamani, Moscow, August 16, 2017

Ladies and gentlemen,

My Bolivian colleague, Foreign Minister of Bolivia Fernando Huanacuni Mamani, and I had constructive and intensive talks.
The minister of the multi-ethnic state of Bolivia conveyed the message of the president of that country Evo Morales to President Putin. We reiterated our countries’ commitment to expanding our partnership across all areas.

We discussed the state of our bilateral relations. We have a rich and multifaceted agenda. We noted the very good dynamics of the political dialogue, and the successful implementation of the agreements reached last year during the visit to Russia of Mr Mamani’s predecessor as foreign minister of Bolivia. Everything that the presidents discussed, and everything we agreed upon between our respective foreign, economic, and social ministries, as well as our companies, is being implemented at a fairly steady pace.

Our economic ties have good potential. All existing opportunities, as well as the projects that we need to implement, were reviewed during a meeting of the Intergovernmental Commission on Trade and Economic Cooperation. The participants noted good prospects in the field of energy, which in fact we confirmed today. In July, Gazprom signed a letter of intent with the national oil and gas company of Bolivia. Rosatom and Bolivia are finalising a number of contracts and a programme for strategic cooperation in the sphere of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, including the construction of a nuclear research centre using Russian technology. Our energy companies are interested in supplying equipment for the thermal power stations and hydroelectric power stations being built in Bolivia, and upgrading the existing ones. Considering that Bolivia's development plans provide for an increase in the share of new energy sources, including geothermal, solar and wind power, RusHydro is ready to provide the corresponding technology. We discussed this today as well. We believe that our specialised departments and companies have something to work on specifically in this field.

Speaking of energy, we discussed multilateral dimensions of our interaction, primarily within the framework of the Gas Exporting Countries Forum, the next summit of which will be held in Bolivia in November. We will do our best to help our Bolivian friends make this summit a success, clearly formulating a further programme of actions aimed at ensuring an equitable balance of interests of gas producers and consumers.

We see an increase in mutual interest in investment projects in the petrochemical, agricultural, transportation and other spheres. Contacts between the regions of Russia and Bolivia are getting stronger. Today, we spoke about good prospects for deepening military-technical cooperation. An intergovernmental commission is also operating in this area, which will meet in Moscow this month.

There is mutual interest in developing contacts in the humanitarian and cultural spheres. Our Bolivian friends are interested to prepare their specialists at Russian universities. Such cooperation is developing. Experts are being trained both in civil and law enforcement specialties, primarily in the sphere of combating terrorism and drug trafficking. On a separate note, training of nuclear energy personnel will expand.

We discussed international problems and stated our identical positions on the overwhelming majority of these urgent matters on the international agenda. Both of our countries are consistent advocates of a just and stable polycentric global arrangement on the basis of international law and the world’s cultural and civilisational diversity. Russia and Bolivia are united in denouncing the attempts to undermine the objective process of shaping a multi-polar world by renouncing multilateral cooperation, to resort to unilateral and illegitimate measures, including interference in domestic affairs by military and other means. We are opposing such attempts by our commitment to multisided cooperation in full conformity with the principles of the UN Charter and a search for generally acceptable solutions of any problems on the basis of an honest balance of interests.

Speaking about regional issues, we expressed gratitude to our friends for their invariable support for the development of the contacts between the Russian Federation and Latin America and its structures, including the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR), Union of South American Nations (UNASUR), and Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA).

We considered it particularly important to confirm our position on the situation in Venezuela. We are united in realising the need to promptly overcome contradictions in that country exclusively by peaceful means, via national dialogue and without any outside pressure not to mention unacceptable threats of armed interference in the country's domestic affairs, which have already been strongly condemned by the overwhelming majority of Latin American nations.

In conclusion I would like to emphasise that we highly appreciate coordination of our actions at multilateral platforms, primarily in the UN Security Council. This year and in subsequent years, Bolivia will be a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council. We are closely coordinating measures on all problems that are submitted to the UN Security Council. Bolivia is supporting Russian initiatives reviewed by the UN. These are international information security, consolidation of confidence-building measures in space, renunciation of unacceptable glorification of Nazism, and appeals to all states to assume commitments not to be the first to deploy weapons in space, not to resort to illegitimate forms of cooperation in the world arena, not to interfere in internal affairs of other states, not to extrapolate their domestic actions abroad and not to recognise coups d’etat as a legitimate form of changing power. Every year all of these provisions and principles are subjected to voting in the UN General Assembly. Like the overwhelming majority of other states, Russia and Bolivia invariably support them.

I think we had very beneficial talks that reaffirmed our attitude towards comprehensively deepening our cooperation in the interests of our countries and peoples. I am grateful to my colleague, Bolivian Foreign Minister Fernando Huanacuni Mamani, for today’s interaction.

Question: In a conversation yesterday with your Chinese colleague, Wang Yi, you again noted that it would be unacceptable to use force to resolve the crisis on the Korean Peninsula and stressed Moscow's readiness to strengthen coordination with Beijing in the settlement process. Does this coordination imply certain economic steps, or is it just about diplomatic steps?

Sergey Lavrov: With regard to using our influence on Pyongyang in order to make it comply with the well-known UN Security Council resolutions, we are deeply convinced that the economic pressure has practically run its course. We cannot support the ideas that some of our partners continue to nurture, which literally seek to strangle North Korea economically with all the negative, tragic humanitarian ramifications for the people of the DPRK.
We operate on the premise that all of the UN Security Council resolutions without exception, which have already introduced serious economic measures, contain the Security Council’s obligations to continue supporting the process of returning to political talks and seeking a peaceful diplomatic settlement on the Korean Peninsula. All economic measures of influence imposed by the Security Council for several years have been implemented by the UN member states, and the UN Security Council's call and commitment to the parties concerned to pay attention to the political track has, in fact, been ignored. Russia and China believe that this is wrong, and even harmful and dangerous.

So, we have come up with a joint initiative that includes the well-known "double freeze" principle: North Korea will not test nuclear weapons and missiles, and the United States and the Republic of Korea will not conduct large-scale exercises in this region. I am aware of the US response to this "double freeze" principle. They believe that legal cannot be exchanged for illegal. However, this is not about getting stuck in being right or thinking about certain falsely understood issues of prestige, but about the future of this region and hundreds of thousands of people who, according to experts, may be affected in case of hostilities, which Washington or Pyongyang never stop threatening. Recently, this rhetoric has somewhat subsided.

Perhaps we should at least hope that the hotheads calm down a little. In conjunction with the People's Republic of China, we will push for compliance with the UN Security Council resolutions, which talk about the need to return to the political process. The UNSC economic measures have never been taken in isolation from the recognition of the need for a peaceful settlement. Our joint proposals with China are included in the joint statement of July 4, which deals exclusively with political and diplomatic steps.

Question: What can you say about Iranian President Hassan Rouhani’s statement that Tehran may walk away from the nuclear programme agreement if Washington continues to put Iran under pressure? What is Moscow’s attitude to Iran’s decision to increase its missile programme budget?

Sergey Lavrov: The missile programme budget is basically Iran’s business. It is not prohibited from having this programme. There are no legal bans in UN Security Council resolutions on this issue.

As for Iranian President Hassan Rouhani’s statement that Tehran may quit the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) that was concluded to resolve the situation around Iran’s nuclear programme, I hope this won’t take place. I also hope the United States will not violate its JCPOA commitments, either.

As is known, in line with the periodic reviews mandated by US law, the United States has certified that Iran is meeting its commitments under the JCPOA. However, in parallel Washington has imposed new unilateral sanctions on Iran. It explained that these sanctions do not concern Iran’s nuclear programme or the JCPOA but reflect US discontent with Tehran’s actions in other areas, including human rights and its conduct in the region. There may be only one response to this. Unilateral sanctions are unacceptable in principle and irresponsible if they are used to change in one’s favour a well-calibrated balance (as is the case with the Iran nuclear deal) because they may upset this balance. One shouldn't resort to such provocations because the matter deals not even with national interests of a country but with an enormous region where we are interested in ensuring a nuclear-free status.

Now I would like to make the second point in this context. We have suggested reaching an honest deal more than once – if a package of economic measures of influence on any country be it the DPRK or Iran is being agreed upon in the UN Security Council and a resolution is adopted, all parties should assume commitments to limit themselves to this negotiated package of sanctions and not to come up with unilateral restrictions so as to make up for what has not become part of the collective package. The Americans are vehemently opposed although it is hard to reject this principle. It will remain an urgent imperative. We will continue upholding it in all subsequent discussions and have already made corresponding statements at the UN Security Council consultations. This is a position of principle shared by many of our partners.

Question (addressed to both ministers): A nuclear research centre is under construction in Bolivia with Russia’s support. At what stage is this project now? Bolivia has large energy resources and Russia is interested in helping it develop its hydrocarbon industry. What can Russia do in this regard?

Sergey Lavrov (speaking after Fernando Huanacuni Mamani): As for the nuclear research centre, our state corporation Rosatom and its partners in Bolivia have already signed a contract on preliminary work and are carrying it out. I have just talked with Mr Foreign Minister about how this month we will continue consultations on a master contract. There is every chance to sign it in September, which will allow us to open the centre’s first facilities in 2019, as the Bolivian side wants.




LATEST EVENTS

22.10.2018 - Embassy Press Officer’s reply to a media question concerning comparisons in Britain between Russian and Saudi Arabia’s reactions to high-profile incidents

Question: After the reports concerning the death of the Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, the British media have been drawing parallels between the actions of Saudi Arabia and Russia. Are there any good reasons for such comparisons? Answer: We have already stated that we would not be commenting idle talks. It is for journalists, not diplomats, to speculate on this kind of issues. However, we have taken note of yet another article by Boris Johnson in “The Daily Telegraph”, where he compares the death of Jamal Khashoggi to the so-called poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury. In particular, he insists that Saudi Arabia and Turkey should – and rightly so – provide the public with as much information as possible concerning the exact causes of the journalist’s death.


15.10.2018 - Embassy Press Officer’s reply to a media question concerning the ties between “Bellingcat” and secret services

Question: Russian officials claim that “Bellingcat” is connected to intelligence agencies of the Western countries, but do not present any evidence of such ties. Doesn’t such approach contradict Russia’s position on the Salisbury incident, the MH-17 catastrophe and other notable cases, where the Russian government is continuously demanding to publish proofs of accusations? Answer: There is no contradiction. The fact that “Bellingcat” is affiliated to the intelligence services is obvious considering the whole range of relevant circumstances: date of its foundation (several days prior to the MH-17 catastrophe), nature of published information (which combines signs of intelligence data and highly professional fakes), its orientation (always anti-Russian), timeline of publications (each time at the best moment from the point of view of interests of NATO countries), biography of its leader (Elliot Higgins suddenly turned from a PC gamer into an “icon of independent journalism), non-transparency of its internal structure and financing. If “Bellingcat” can provide any other plausible explanation for such combination of facts, it should be presented to the public.


15.10.2018 - Embassy Press Officer’s reply to a media question concerning the British government calls to step up anti-Russian sanctions

Question: How would you comment on the news that the British government has been lobbying a new EU sanctions regime against Russian nationals allegedly involved in use of chemical weapons and cyber-attacks in Europe? Answer: We have taken note of the respective statement by Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt of 14 October and the relevant media reports. These suggest that, faced with an imminent Brexit, the British government makes every effort to step up the sanctions pressure on Russia and to complicate as much as possible Russia-EU relations after Brexit.


13.10.2018 - Embassy Press Officer’s reply to a media question concerning the investigation of the death of Nikolay Glushkov

Q.: 12 October marks seven months since the death of Nikolay Glushkov. Does the Embassy have any new information on this case? A.: Unfortunately, once again we have to state that the British side continues to evade any sort of cooperation with Russia with regard to the investigation of the death of former Deputy Director General of “Aeroflot” Mr Glushkov that occurred on British soil on 12 March. The British authorities continue to ignore numerous Russian requests, including the official request of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation for legal assistance in the criminal case opened in Russia into the Nikolay Glushkov’s death. There are no answers to the Embassy’s proposals to arrange a meeting or consultations between the Investigative Committee, Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation experts and the Metropolitan Police representatives.


12.10.2018 - Ambassador Yakovenko’s introductory remarks at the press-conference on 12 October 2018

Ladies and gentlemen, In recent weeks we have received a number of media requests concerning the current state of bilateral affairs between Russia and the United Kingdom. I am also often asked how numerous anti-Russian statements by the British officials influence our approach towards the UK. Considering this, I have decided to invite you today to make respective short comments on these issues and answer your additional questions. Currently the relations between Russia and the UK are at a very low level. The reason for that lies in an aggressive anti-Ru ssian campaign launched by the current Tory government and supported by the British media.


09.10.2018 - Embassy Press Officer’s reply to a media question concerning the new Bellingcat’s investigation

Question: How would you comment on Bellingcat’s claims that it has “tracked down Alexander Petrov’s real identity”? Answer: The Foreign and Commonwealth Office has recently advised us to consider such publications and statements as a display of freedom of public debate into which the UK Government does not interfere. There have already been reports that the Home Office and Metropolitan Police would not comment on these “speculations”. This is exactly the case when we should follow the example of our British colleagues.


08.10.2018 - Embassy Press Officer’s reply to a media question concerning the UK authorities’ reaction to Russia’s official requests following recent flagrant media publications

Question: The Embassy declared its intent to request clarifications from the British side following the recent accusations of cyberattacks, and the media reports on preparations for retaliatory cyberstrikes against targets in Russia. Has there been any response? Answer: Today we have received a reply from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office which implies that, as before, the British side is not going to provide us with any details that may serve as the basis of the accusations. In this case, we are not in a position to make comments on the essence of those accusations.


05.10.2018 - Embassy comment on another groundless British accusation against Russia

On 4 October, UK Permanent Representative to OPCW Peter Wilson speaking on behalf of Minister for Europe Sir Alan Duncan claimed that the “GRU” allegedly “attempted to compromise UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office computer systems via a spear phishing attack” and “targeted computers of the UK Defence and Science Technology Laboratory”. The same day the UK National Cyber Security Centre stated that “multiple email accounts belonging to a small UK-based TV station were accessed and content stolen” and “the GRU was almost certainly responsible”.Today, the Embassy has forwarded a Note Verbale to the FCO demanding that the UK Government produces and immediately shares with the Russian side hard evidence and proofs supporting those claims, and informs about sources used to draw such conclusions. We have reminded, in particular, that Russia had repeatedly proposed expert consultations on cybersecurity in order to address UK’s concerns, if any.


04.10.2018 - Embassy Press Officer’s reply to a media question concerning the BBC journalist Mark Urban’s book on Sergei Skripal

Q.: How would you comment on the Mark Urban’s book on Sergei Skripal published on 4 October? A.: We intend yet to study this book. At the same time, it is a well known fact that Mark Urban has close links with British secret services. This gives us grounds for considering this book as an attempt to compensate for Sergei Skripal’s public non-appearance as the key witness to the Salisbury incident. Instead of facts, the public is again offered speculation and guesses.


04.10.2018 - Embassy Press Officer’s reply to a media question concerning the recent anti-Russian statement by the Foreign Office

Question: How would you comment on today’s statement by the Foreign Office accusing Russia of worldwide cyber-attacks on massive scale? Answer: This statement is reckless. It has become a tradition for such claims to lack any evidence. It is yet another element of the anti-Russian campaign by the UK Government.



all messages