12 August 2020
Moscow: 17:51
London: 15:51

Consular queries:  
+44 (0) 203 668 7474  
info@rusemb.org.uk  

 
892 days have passed since the Salisbury incident - no credible information or response from the British authorities                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     884 days have passed since the death of Nikolay Glushkov on British soil - no credible information or response from the British authorities

PRESS RELEASES AND NEWS

13.02.2019

Statement by Permanent Representative Vassily Nebenzia at the UN Security Council Briefing on Ukraine

Mr. President,

Above all, let me thank today’s briefers: Mr. M.Jenča, Mm. U.Müller, Mr. E.Apakan and Mr. M.Sajdik.

We have initiated this meeting in order to discuss the course of implementation of “Package of Measures for the Implementation of the Minsk Agreements” – the most important document for the settlement of Ukraine’s internal crisis. It was signed 4 years ago, on 12 February 2015 by the representatives of OSCE, Ukraine, Russia, DPR and LPR.

We have all the reason to raise this topic at the UN, because this document is an inalienable part (annex) of the Security Council Resolution 2202 dated 17 February 2015, which endorses this document in the very first operative paragraph. Besides, the President of the Security Council reiterated support for the implementation of the Package of Measures in the statement dated 6 June 2018.

Some of our partners in the Security Council for some reason have the illusion (not only, but particularly on this matter), that we are ill at ease when discussing the Ukrainian issue. To say the least, it is not true. To say more – it is on the contrary. On the contrary, like no one else we are interested to make the world know how Western countries first staged a coup d’état in this country and then gave Kiev an indulgence for any action taken under the pretext of mythical Russian threat and “aggression”.

On 21 February it will have been five years since the then President of the country V.Yanukovych signed an agreement with the opposition on the peaceful settlement of the crisis in the presence of high representatives of the EU, Germany, Poland and France who acted as guarantors. Shortly thereafter, he was deceived and finally he had to leave Ukraine. Who knows, probably, if he had acted in the same manner as the current Ukrainian authorities or, say, the leaders of democratic countries who do not hesitate to use force against protestors, Ukraine would not have plunged into a deep economic crisis, rightlessness and lawlessness, and would not have become a commodity appendix to EU and its labor force supplier.

Besides, he had reason to act like this, because protestors (today it is an established fact) were armed and intended to seize power at the cost of any, even blood-drenched provocations. And so they did in the end.

I speak about it in much detail with a purpose. I want to make clear, that Western countries on the whole and the three pseudo-guarantors I mentioned in particular are directly responsible for what has happened and is still happening. Same for the United States – this is the real “puppet-master” behind the entire “Maidan theatre” who now encourages and covers up any provocation of Kiev, including the recent one in the Black Sea, willingly delivers arms to the country and pushes it towards reckless steps.

Unfortunately, it is obvious to us that the West is not interested in Ukraine itself, in its fate and well-being of its citizens. For them this country is a mere pawn in the geopolitical confrontation with Russia.

Seemingly, four years ago the international community and sides to the Ukrainian conflict agreed on the settlement formula. In May 2018 during the meeting of the Security Council convened by our Polish colleagues, we in maximum detail elaborated on the Minsk Package of Measures. That is why I am not going to do this today. We would like you to have this document in front of you, therefore, we decided to print and hand out to you resolution 2202.Every single time I urge you: read this document very carefully. Do not recite the phrase you memorized: “Russia has to implement the Minsk agreements”. The agreements do not say a word about Russia. We have repeatedly said that this is absurd. Kiev sabotages “Minsk” and tries to make Moscow accountable.

I will only highlight once again what is the most important. It is the sequence of steps listed in the resolution. It is not a coincidence, that they have been put in this order, from 1 to 13, because the sequence of their implementation is what matters the most.

I repeat, para. 9 on transferring the control over the Russian border in Donetsk and Luhansk regions to the Ukrainian side can only be implemented after all the other paragraphs have been implemented, among them disengagement of forces and hardware, adoption of the law on special status for Donbass, establishment of self-government authorities on the basis of this law, amnesty, exchange of detainees and a number of other steps.

However, today, to our regret, there is all the reason to say that Kiev comprehensively and consciously ignores and sabotages the Minsk agreements and our western partners cover up for all of its unlawful acts. This situation is at best illustrated by the fact that on 5 February the General Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine started criminal proceedings against one of the leaders of the opposition V.Medvedchuk who had decided to run for the elections to be held on 31 March 2019.

The reason for this prosecution was his call for the direct dialogue between Kiev and Donbass and special status for Donbass within Ukraine – steps enshrined in the Minsk Package of Measures. In other words, the implementation of the Minsk Agreements in today’s Ukraine equals to a treason and entails criminal prosecution.

The need for direct dialogue between DPR, LPR and the authorities that is embodied in the Minsk Agreements is something Kiev is allergic to. Once again, our Western colleagues pretend they do not notice this; thus they show how skillfully they can use “double standards”.

Why do I say “double standards”? Because in all the other conflicts on the Security Council agenda we all try to bring the opposing sides to the negotiation table in order to stop military action and start political process.

Let us recall Syria. What is “the proverbial story” of our efforts? Yes, to establish Constitutional Committee where the government and the opposition would take part and reach agreements based on “Syrian-led and Syrian-owned” political process.

Recall Yemen. You all applauded when the government of Yemen and “Ansar Allah” came to the Stockholm agreement. More than that, now you (and us as well) keep fingers crossed for these fragile agreements to be implemented.

We all welcomed the Khartoum agreements on CAR that sought for reconciliation of once irreconcilables. The purpose of any peaceful process – and you can hardly argue with that – is to find a political, not military decision to the conflict by means of direct negotiations of conflicting sides.

Then why should Ukraine be different? Why do you not make Kiev agree to sit down at the negotiation table with the direct participants of this confrontation? Why do you go on treating us to your worn out hackneyed statements that Russia “should this”, “should that” and “should that”?

Do not bother answering. I answer to this myself. Besides, you would not have done it anyway.

This happens, because you are satisfied with the sly paradigm pursued by the Kiev authorities: “this is not a civil conflict, this is war with Russia”. It is well-known that war is something many things can be written off for. That is what President P.Poroshenko does. It turns out that all the misfortunes and calamities that have befallen Ukraine not only in recent years, but in the three recent centuries are the consequences of “Russia’s occupation of Ukraine”. In order to suit this fake paradigm Ukraine spares no effort to create a new falsified history, made up from skeletons taken out of closets.

In this paradigm, the Kiev authorities do not have to agree on anything, because not their citizens, but an “aggressor-country” is a party to conflict. Therefore, you can tear Minsk Agreements apart and throw the pieces into a rubbish bin. That is what the Ukrainian authorities did. They believe they do not have to talk to their own citizens, residents of Donetsk and Luhansk. However, the residents of Donetsk and Luhansk for some reason do not see any “aggressor”, they do not protest against their de facto authorities and they do not beg Kiev to “save” them.

Whereas Kiev finds it acceptable to shed hypocritical crocodile tears for their citizens and indiscriminately call them “terrorists”. And, well, you do not talk to terrorists. You eliminate them. This is the entire primitive construct of the Kiev authorities. Primitive, yet effective. It is effective, because you cover them up. And this is shameful!

The situation in the South-East of Ukraine remains explosive. Kiev does not observe the ceasefire agreement and has moved far into the “grey zone” (Y.Biryukov, counsellor to President P.Poroshenko has recently proven this). The developments have come to a point where the positions of the sides have come too close to each other at some locations. Recent reports by SMM OSCE confirm that new Ukrainian tanks and artillery arrive at Donbass.

Kiev also persistently avoids implementing its political obligations, tries to marginalize the mechanisms of Minsk Contact Group and give a second go-round to the once agreed issues. Our Western partners encourage this by saying, e.g. like Kurt Volker, that the proclaimed republics of Donbass “have no place in Minsk Agreements” and that “they should be disbanded”. While President P.Poroshenko says that “there is no Minsk format”. What reaction do you expect from Donbass in response to such rhetoric?

Because of Western States being totally permissive of any action Kiev takes, the country has developed a strong environment of lawlessness and flourishing extremism, such environment incites hatred to Russia and suppresses any dissent. Kiev’s unreadiness to follow the OSCE standards strictly has become more obvious in the course of recent years.

You do your best not to notice this. Partly because it is truly difficult to walk through the maze of Ukrainian surrealist domestic political life when you deal with it first-hand, without translation. So you continue to use worn out clichés about “democratic choice” and right to a “bright future” in the “family of democratic countries”, on rare occasion mildly scolding Ukraine for the lack of progress in promoting reforms and countering corruption.

In reality, and this is the most important, you consciously ignore flagrant violations of democratic and civilized rules and outrageous lawlessness, lie, and uprising neonazism.

Only recently the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) received official rejection from the Foreign Ministry of Ukraine to issue accreditation to Russian observers at the presidential elections to be held in March. Ukrainian Minister of the Interior A.Avakov promised to double check not only Russian, but all international observers at the extremist website “Myrotvorets”, prohibited in a number of countries.

For those who are not aware, this website violates the existing rules on protection of personal data and posts personal data of people who, Kiev nationalists claim as unwanted. Some of them have already been killed. As a matter of fact, this is about putting "pirate black marks” on people (or entering names on a “hit list”). If someone thinks that there are only Russians on this list, I will say that today at this site there is data on politicians from Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary.

Such steps of Kiev represent another grave violation of international commitments; besides, it seriously damages ODIHR which pretends to be the “golden standard” of observing elections. Here it is worth saying that the decision of Maidan authorities not to open polling stations in Russia deprived millions of Ukrainians who found themselves in Russia of an opportunity to vote which calls into question the transparency and objectiveness of the upcoming vote.

Obviously, the population of Donbass will not have a single chance to vote, while there are 4 million of them (it accounts for nearly 10% of the total 42,3 mln of Ukrainian population). What do you think, for whom would these residents of Ukraine vote? Or rather, for whom would they not? The current Kiev authorities who so hypocritically shed tears for people in Donbass do not actually want them. Amidst impure political games, Kiev has already cut them off and left behind. Let me recall, that Kiev introduced economic, transportation, energy and social blockade against Donbass – apparently in an attempt to “take care” of the population.

We would like to listen to the Western mentors of Kiev, who are present in this room today; we would like to learn their principal assessment of Ukraine’s democratic development. It goes without saying that this assessment should reflect the situation with religious freedom in Ukraine, where Orthodox churches are impudently appropriated under direct assistance of legislative and executive authorities. In the heat of election campaigns Ukrainian authorities totally forgot that in civilized countries state is separated from church and that in Ukraine the Constitution guarantees this. However current authorities shamelessly play this religious card, dividing the faithful and flagrantly violating religious freedom.

In conclusion, I would like to emphasize that the key impediment to the settlement of the crisis and normalization of life of ordinary people is the lack of clear reaction of Western countries to Kiev’s unwillingness to implement the Package of Measures which is already 4 years old. As a matter of fact, and we have said so, it comes to sabotaging UN SC resolution 2202.

As a result Kiev provokes new ventures that threaten to escalate the situation and destroy the peaceful process. We do hope that the participants of today’s meeting will call for Ukrainian authorities to comply strictly with their international commitments. Kiev should finally understand that the implementation of the Minsk Package of Measures is the only chance for peace and settlement in Ukraine. And one more thing. We want to warn everyone – Kiev as well as its sponsors – against hopes for plan “B”, particularly if somebody is under the illusion that there is a military solution to Ukrainian internal conflict.

http://russiaun.ru/en/news/ukraine1120219




LATEST EVENTS

25.07.2020 - "Concerning the sensational report on Russia". Article from News Agency "RIA Novosti", 23 July 2020

The report was prepared before last year’s general election, but its publication was long delayed by the ruling Conservatives, and opponents of Boris Johnson accused him of doing it specifically to downplay the Russian threat and prevent his party from losing credibility. Now, however, the report, written in part by well-known retired MI-5 employee Christopher Style (creator of the file on Trump’s “Russian contacts”), has been published. The British press has been disappointed: there is no proof of Russian interference in the Brexit referendum (although they cannot understand how the British voted to leave the EU when most of the political elite, almost all of the press and the City were against it), although there are rumours of attempts to influence the Scottish independence referendum. This, however, is London’s point of view; from Moscow’s perspective, the report is sensational, because its authors’ conclusions are the best evidence that the British powers-that-be are prepared to work in the Kremlin’s interests. Style and Browder (another co-author of the report) do not in fact understand this, but this is the skill of the so-called KGB heirs’ game. But let’s start at the beginning.


16.07.2020 - The Human Rights Situation in Ukraine - Report of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

The human rights situation in Ukraine continues to degrade. The Kyiv authorities adopt legislative acts contrary to the rules of national law and international obligations. Human rights activists document systemic violations of fundamental human rights and freedoms. Referring to the need to combat the so-called Russian aggression and separatism, political opponents, independent journalists, media outlets, and undesirable members of public organizations are being prosecuted. The rights of internally displaced persons, the Russian-speaking population, and representatives of national minorities are limited. The clergy and parishioners of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church are being prosecuted. The right to liberty and security of person is not respected. In Ukraine, there are numerous facts of illegal detention, torture, intimidation, ill-treatment, sexual violence, including to obtain confessions or compel cooperation.


16.07.2020 - Embassy comment concerning today’s unfriendly statements by Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab

The Embassy has noted the statements by the UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab concerning unspecified “Russian actors” who have “almost certainly” sought to interfere in 2019 UK General Election through “online amplification” of sensitive documents relating to the UK-US Free Trade Agreement, as well as the alleged responsibility of “Russian Intelligence Services” for cyber attacks aimed at stealing research information on coronavirus vaccine development.


06.07.2020 - Embassy comment on the UK announcement of sanctions over the Magnitsky case

The decision by the British Government to impose sanctions against a number of Russian officials invoking the death of Sergei Magnitsky in 2009 reflects the self-declared status of the UK as the global leader in sanctions policy. All questions regarding the circumstances of Mr Magnitsky’s death have been answered long ago. Today’s decision was quite obviously conceived merely as a public move.


29.06.2020 - Embassy press officer’s reply to a media question on British media reports on Russian “collusion” with the Taliban in Afghanistan

Question: How would you comment on the recent reports in British media that Russia supposedly offered “bounty” to the Taliban to kill UK as well as US soldiers in Afghanistan?


16.05.2020 - Ambassador Andrei Kelin's letter to Financial Times

Dear Editor, I feel compelled to express disagreement with the Financial Times coverage of Russia’s efforts to combat the Covid-19 pandemic. Judging by your reports, Russia’s response has been to manipulate with figures at home and to spread disinformation abroad, with the government acting inefficiently and doctors having inadequate protection. This distorted picture requires a refutation. Even by most pessimistic accounts, Russia’s performance in terms of healthcare system capacity and death rate is among the best of all major countries.


15.05.2020 - Ambassador Andrei Kelin's letter to The Times

Sir, Roger Boyes is wondering why Russian industrialists (he calls them ‘oligarchs’) are helping to fight Covid-19. Are they suddenly ‘embracing philanthropy’, or ‘cleaning up their nasty image’, or else seeking to impose a ‘new compact’ on the ‘floundering’ government?


11.05.2020 - Statement by the Foreign Ministry concerning US attempts to rewrite the history of the Victory over Nazism

Attempts to distort the results of the defeat of Nazism and the decisive contribution our country made, which are continuing in Washington even during these days of universal celebration of the 75th anniversary of Victory, cause utter indignation.


08.05.2020 - Telephone conversation between Russian President Vladimir Putin and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson

Vladimir Putin had a telephone conversation with Prime Minister of Great Britain Boris Johnson. The President of Russia and the Prime Minister of Great Britain exchanged greetings on the 75th anniversary of Victory over Nazism, which became one of the greatest events of the 20th century and an example of unprecedented cooperation between the countries of the anti-Hitler coalition. Vladimir Putin noted in part that Russia remembers the exploits of the British sailors, participants in the Arctic convoys, owing to which the Soviet army and industry received arms and equipment needed during the war.


07.05.2020 - Press release on Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s telephone conversation with UK Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Dominic Raab

On May 6, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov had a telephone conversation with UK Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Dominic Raab at the latter's initiative. The two officials exchanged greetings in connection with the upcoming 75th anniversary of the victory in WWII. They noted the contribution of the members of the anti-Hitler coalition in the fight against Nazism, and emphasised the importance of using the alliance's experience in mobilising the international community's efforts to counteract today's global challenges. Particular attention was paid to discussing the efforts being taken to tackle the spread of the novel coronavirus infection and to overcome its effects.



all messages